Logo

Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?

Last Updated: 22.06.2025 05:50

Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?

Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.

Let’s just make it real clear:

Russia can stop this any time.

Why are most girls not open to the idea of anal sex?

Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.

“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.

Thank you.

Morning Briefing: Lindor Ties Jeter on Home Run Leaderboard - Metsmerized Online

Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?

Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?

Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.

Common Childhood Virus Linked to Alzheimer’s Development in Old Age - Yahoo

Just in the last 5 years:

Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.

All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.

Would you let your partner cheat on you every now and again?

Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.

Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.

Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.

While you sleep, these bugs throw a party on your face - East Idaho News

Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.

Any day of the week — including Sundays.

Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.

Aut dolorem voluptates tempore maxime.

Sending ATACMS is WW3.

Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.

Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?

Wall Street warns Trump aides the GOP tax bill could jolt bond markets - The Washington Post

Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.

Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.

Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.

What is the best eye serum for dark circles?

Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.

Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.

What’s next?

What is the "abundance agenda" and how does it relate to supply-side liberalism?